The challenge

Manual data management consumes monitoring budgets

Funded marine projects spend a significant portion of their monitoring budgets on manual data management. Field teams collect data in different formats, consultants manually compile reports, and evidence packages arrive months after funder deadlines.

Restoration outcomes often go untracked beyond initial outplanting. Without systematic follow-up, projects cannot demonstrate long-term impact or justify continued funding.

When multiple implementing partners contribute data, reconciling formats, quality standards, and reporting timelines creates significant overhead for project management units.

How MariMap helps

Purpose-built monitoring for large ocean programs

Dedicated project deployment

Each funded project gets a configured instance scoped to its monitoring requirements, partner structure, and reporting calendar. Custom branding and data governance included.

Automated funder reporting

Reports are generated in the format your funder requires. Indicator tables, progress summaries, and evidence packages compile automatically from field data.

Restoration lifecycle tracking

Track restoration units from nursery propagation through outplanting, survival monitoring, and long-term habitat recovery. Survival curves and coverage metrics update as new data arrives.

MRV-ready evidence with audit trail

Every data point carries metadata about who collected it, when, where, and with which protocol. Versioned datasets and approval workflows support third-party verification.

Project deployments are structured as annual partnerships, scoped to your monitoring requirements. Typical deployments range from 15,000 to 50,000 USD per year.